Piloting Accountability Systems for Humanitarian Aid in Somalia using SMS Feedback from beneficiaries and integrating the feedback into Social Media.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Friday, April 13, 2012
Salahley field trip report - 01/04/2012
The
third phase roll out of the Beneficiary SMS Feedback system took place on 25th
March, 2012, in Salahley district. We visited Salahley town and 6 villages with
ongoing Community-Driven Recovery and Development (CDRD) projects, including:
construction and rehabilitating of water tanks (barkets) and wells and farming
irrigation system. We met beneficiaries and carried out mobilization and awareness
campaign in: Ina-igare, Ina-guha, Aden
Abokor, Qolbulale, Qoldhuhule, Dhinbiriyale villages and Salahley town.
Goal:
· Roll out Beneficiary SMS
Feedback System to Salahley district.
· Mobilize beneficiaries,
informing and explaining to them how the feedback
system works.
system works.
· Establishing a good working
relations with the Community Project
Implementation Unit (CPIU), Village Committees and local DRC staff to help us
implement the project effectively and act as our contact point in the field.
Implementation Unit (CPIU), Village Committees and local DRC staff to help us
implement the project effectively and act as our contact point in the field.
After travelling for 2 hours on a rough road for 75km south of Hargiesa, we
reached Salahley town about 2pm. On the way, we witnessed signs of drought and
villages where many residents migrated to save their livestock. We have come
across skeletons of dead animals on the roadside. Winter season is dry, cold
and harsh for nomadic communities living in rural areas and they often migrate
with their young children and livestock in search of water and greener
pastures.
For the following 5 days we visited beneficiaries in Salahley town and
the 6 villages for mobilization and awareness raising, these were mainly beneficiaries
of water tanks rehabilitation, distribution of seeds
and farming tools and community centres.
Beneficiaries included women,
students, project implementation committee units (CPIU) and village elders. We met them in
groups to make sure we cover as many beneficiaries as possible. As we have done
with all the other beneficiaries, we explained in detail how the beneficiary
SMS feedback system works, gave them a demonstration by sending an SMS that
returned an automated reply. They welcomed the idea and liked that they had a
direct access to the Hargeisa office where they can send their feedback any
time of the day. The meetings were interactive with beneficiaries asking a lot
of questions.
In Qolbulale village, located
on the Somaliland and Ethiopia border, we met Tawakal Women's Association, an
active women’s group advocating on issues of education, health, sanitation, and
development. This was the only village where we met an organised and active
women’s group. We interviewed the chairman of the association, Ms. Koos Aden.
She told us that CDRD project has supported Qolbulale residents and women in
particular, by building public toilets and distributing food, farming tools,
and rehabilitating of 4 water tanks. She has expressed her gratitude for these
much needed services which have contributed to the wellbeing of all the
residents but she called on CDRD to do more during the winter season by
providing humanitarian assistance. In winter, the village suffers acute water
and food shortages, sanitation problems and they need animal vaccination to
save their livestock.
To manage beneficiaries’ expectations from DRC we emphasized that we
will definitely pass on their requests and concerns to DRC, but emphasized that
the feedback system is more than requesting for further assistance and we would
like to hear details of how previous projects have contributed to their lifestyles.
To give them examples of kinds of helpful feedbacks we are looking for, we have
shared some SMSes received from beneficiaries in El-Afweny, Odweyne and Qardho
regions, which included detailed SMSes of how particular projects have affected
beneficiaries’ lives and some complaints, which help improve project delivery
and strengthen the relationship between DRC and beneficiaries.
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Beerweeso village beneficiaries
Beneficiaries taking part of a workshop to produce a community action plan, locally driven process to determine and prioritize the village's needs for funding.
Extract: Policy Briefing from BBC Media Action. March 2012
Our beneficiary SMS feedback project has been covered in the March edition of the BBC Media Action's monthly E-newsletter. Bellow is an extract and at the end you can find a link to the full brief.
"Still left in the dark? How people in emergencies
use communication to survive – and how humanitarian agencies can help"
Feedback
on community projects: The Danish Refugee Council
The Community Driven
Recovery and Development (CDRD) project in Somalia provides small grants to
communities for local projects identified and managed by community committees.
In the interests of effective long distance management – and transparency – the
Danish Refugee Council (DRC) has placed as much project information as possible
online on a dedicated CDRD website and on facebook, including photos of theprojects
at key stages – a requirement for the release of new tranches of funding.
One unexpected and positive
side effect of the online approach has been direct engagement from the Somali
diaspora. DRC have seen a number of cases in which Somalis overseas have become
interested in projects, especially those in their areas of origin, to the point
of donating their own money to support these particular projects. “We have had
people from the diaspora topping up the money for the community,” said one DRC
staff member.
DRC are now orientating their
online strategy to target such members of the diaspora. “We hope that putting
information online through social networks will give more opportunities to the
diaspora that would like to support initiatives that take place in their
community of origin, but with which they may not have strong links.” DRC then
applied to the Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF) for support to establish
mechanisms, primarily SMS, whereby benefi ciaries could contact the project
directly with feedback and complaints, and to support their social media work.
All feedback is posted on the CDRD website, organised via the Ushahidi mapping
system that is managed via one simcard installed on a galaxy tablet, requiring
no special arrangement or set-up by a telecom company. The primary motivation
was to open direct communication channels with community members without the
mediation of gatekeepers – such as community representatives and local
authorities – who liaise directly with fi eld staff as a matter of course.
Feedback is translated and
managed by two local staff members. DRC staff visit communities to explain the
system and how it works to ensure everyone understands how to use it. To
overcome problems of illiteracy, the project’s Somali staff are developing
partnerships between schoolkids and parents (as the children are often more
comfortable with new technology). “We see this as a pilot.” said one staff
member. “We also run a big wet feeding programme in Mogadishu. A system like
this could allow us to collect statistics – if we get 500 messages from one
kitchen then that will tell us about food quality”.
To date the project has
received fewer SMS than anticipated (under 100 in three months), most of them
complimentary or saying thank you for support. One of the biggest challenges is
working out how to respond and engage, especially with those whose information
or requests do not relate to DRC’s work. DRC believes that a system level
approach may be needed in the longer termDRC stresses that its work in this
area could not have happened without support from the HIF, which has given them
the space and staffi ng capacity to develop the software and models necessary.
You can download the original full policy brief from the link bellow. The above extract is on page 8.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Kiosks in Bosaso city.
Typical place people with no electricity at their homes will charge their phones and buy air time.
Thursday, March 22, 2012
Our 100th SMS, received today!
"We congratulate the CDRD and its
staff, we are very happy with the work they do here such as: the
construction of the community centre, which has created jobs for some residents who
are poor. This project will help strengthen the community’s relations and
development."
No beneficiary details provided
Lan-mulaho community,
Odweyne district
Original SMS in Somali: "Hadaanu nahay dad waynaha ku dhaqan tuulada lanmulaaxo waxaanu ham balyo
sharafeed u diraynaa hay ada D R C .iyo shaqaalaheeda aad iyo aad baanu ugu
faraxsanahay waxqabad keeda uu ka mid yahay guriga dad wanaha kaasoo iminkana
dad dan yar ahi ay shaqo kaheleen kadibna iskuxidhka bulshada iyo horumarkeeda
waxwaykataridoonta"
Tuesday, March 20, 2012
How a village peacefully voted out a dysfunctional all-male committee
Weeks before I was scheduled to arrive in Bossaso, Puntland, 2
colleagues from the Danish Diming Group, were kidnapped in Galkayo! This
unfortunate incident tightened security in the whole of Puntland and affected my
planned trip to roll out the SMS beneficiary feedback system. It meant postponing
the trip and traveling to Nairobi for a personal security training course. The
course was worth it as I felt better prepared in case there were any security
threats.
I arrived in Bossaso, Puntland, on the 19th of
December. Security was very tight and I had to have security guards whenever I
stepped out of the DRC compound. I had to negotiate hard to be allowed to visit
beneficiaries outside Bossaso. The advice was that visiting Galkayo was totally
out of the question given the high security risk and after back and forth discussions
with both our Nairobi office and staff at the Bossaso office, I was finally
allowed to visit beneficiaries in Qardho, 3 hours drive from Bossaso. On the
condition that I took 2 body guards.
We arrived in Qardho on the 22nd, a small sleepy
town with friendly people. We went straight to meet beneficiaries of 4 projects:
Community market in Shimbiraale; a livelihood project and IDP camp in Qardho
town; community health post and 2 wells in Shire village. The first project
beneficiaries, a group of women at a community market in Shimbiraale, a village
just outside Qardho, had an interesting local governance issue they shared with
us. Their project is part of the Community-Driven Recovery and Development (CDRD)
and the market was already built and functioning.
Around 30 women were at the market when we visited, they seemed
keen to hear the purpose of our visit and about the project. In the middle of
my explanations, a woman with a speaker walked in, she looked like she was in
charge. She sat at the front and politely asked me to repeat the explanation
for her. It turned out she was one of the implementing committee members and a
very active member involved in few other local initiatives. She explained she just returned from a local ‘cleaning day’
event.
I found all the participants engaging, they asked a lot of questions about how the project works and if they could test it by sending SMSes right then. Even though I knew the basics about the project, they insisted on telling me the history. They explained the following:
I found all the participants engaging, they asked a lot of questions about how the project works and if they could test it by sending SMSes right then. Even though I knew the basics about the project, they insisted on telling me the history. They explained the following:
CDRD projects are typically given $15,000 to implement a project
local communities have chosen. The community is then asked to contribute 20% of
the fund in any way they can. Most common form of contribution is labour but in
the Shimbiraale case, the community contributed the land on which the market
was built. The land was valued at $4,000, more than the expected 20% contribution.
As part of the grant, the community is also required to
select an implementing committee to manage the day to day management of the funds
and the project. The Shimbiraale village residents ended up selecting an
all-male committee made of 11 members and they set up a deadline for the
completion of the market.
The committee only built the foundation of the market and the
project fell behind schedule. The
community, mostly the female members, started pressuring the committee to
finish the project as they needed to sell their produce in the market. Impatient
with the slow progress and lack of explanation, some of these female community
members, called for a village meeting and proposed to vote out the committee!
After a village meeting, the committee was found to have:
·
Lack
of cooperation - among themselves and with the community members, which has
interrupted the project’s implementation.
·
Lack
of commitment - most of the elected committees had their personal projects and
prioritized them over the work assigned by the community.
This led the community to vote the whole committee out and
vote in a new committee entirely made up of female members. The new committee managed
to complete the construction of the market within a month of taking over.
I was amazed with the efficiency of the
female members of Shimbiraale village and how determined they were to sort the
problem out. We hear a lot about power struggle and mostly male-domination in the
decision-making process at this level in
most Somali villages and towns but this is the first time I witnessed the
results of a fair and democratic system where a village unanimously voted out a
dysfunctional committee and an all-male committee at that, for the benefit of
the whole community! This story made it worth all the security hassle I had to
go through to visit the beneficiaries. It is the kind of success story of local
decision-making and governance I hope to hear more of.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)